Regardless of mobile computing with the core Pentium, multi-comparison test with the APU

Pentium B940 and A6 batch image contrast 3400m

Throughout, we use a professional evaluation software to test CPU performance, but test results are derived from the software does not allow users to have a specific concept, but often the computer performance is the practical application of the user experience to pass and, therefore, we used this test with magic hands MediaCoder shadow over the performance platform is tested to see in practical applications, the platform Pentium platform B940 A6 with AMD Dell XPS M1210 APU 3400m compared to what the real difference?

Test method is simple, we hand first through the magic of light and shadow on the image zoom 134MB and treatment of the slides, is still a four-core A6 3400m APU B940 with dual-core platform Pentium to do, depending on the time used to complete the task the difference between making for reference.
Pentium B940 run batch jobs with only 1 minute and 41 seconds when
AMD A6 3400m when running task batch with 2 minutes 28 seconds
We see through the practical application files Pentium dual-core B940 134MB image using the batch is 1 minute and 41 seconds, while the quad-core A6 3400m image files using a processor 134MB in sets of 2 minutes 28 seconds and when a difference of 47 seconds. This image is only 134MB capacity test results for batch processing. In routine work, using SLR camera is, the capacity, quantity, speed of operation of these differences that make the time for completion of tasks and gradually widening, the cost will increase by more waiting affect the efficiency, we can see, "four in" In the Dell XPS M1330 practical application processor, not yet fully established.

Product: NV47H24c-B942G32Mnkk gateway laptop Pentium B940 and A6 compared 3400m speed transcoding
· Pentium B940 and A6 compared 3400m speed transcoding

Then we have two possibilities platform video transcoding were compared using the test software for MediaCoder throughout the duration of 24 minutes and 29 seconds, with a capacity of 277MB 720P video compression, and both make the time to assessment and test the B940 Pentium platform with six different Dell XPS M1530 APU 3400m video transcoding platform, to see which platform is most excellent.
Pentium B940-speed test platform video transcoding
A6 platform 3400m video transcoding fast APU test

We see through the practical application of dual-core Pentium processor file B940 277MB video transcoding time to 1246 seconds, while the A6 3400 quad-core processor 277MB video file transcoding time to 1426 seconds, a difference of 180 seconds, which is 3 minutes. Of course, this is the ability of the test results of 277MB video transcoding. In normal life, we met with high-definition video should be at least 1 GB or more, with the increase in capacity, will increase the time spent transcoding, the gap will further widen.

Test Summary: Through testing we have seen, the performance of Intel Pentium B940 multimedia platform is greater than the A6 platform 3400m APU, it is a batch image or video transcoding MediaCoder The first can be done faster than the latter task. On the other hand, the use of quad-core design of the Dell XPS M1730 A6 3400m APU Pentium dual-core B940 in the face when there is no advantage at all, from which we can prove that the number of cores and the relation processor performance is not a decisive role in the advanced architecture B940 Pentium performance processor performance even more remarkable.

Product: UL20GU38FT Asus laptop Celeron U3400 E350 and comparison APU speed transcoding
· Celeron U3400 E350 and comparison APU speed transcoding

CPU usage U3400 laptop users an entry-level began to require the application of transcoding, so that we U3400 low voltage Intel Celeron and AMD processor E350 APU report, because both roughly the same specifications base, however, the former high-definition integrated Intel HD Graphics card, while the second combines the AMD Radeon HD 6310 DX11 graphics heart. The two platforms equipped with laptops, and its market position is also roughly the same, so, for the user to understand the characteristics of the two would be required. Here we take a look at these two platforms on the speed of transcoding high-definition with this kind of performance.
MediaCoder Software Testing (Click for larger image)

The selected test MediaCoder (2011 build 5138) of this software, it is comprehensive, convenient to use a format conversion software free. The source of the film we use is a 1080p capacity of 1.6 GB of "X-Man3" ("Wolverine") HD sources. Perform format conversion task MP4, whose platform the first to finish the task, another test platform will also be terminated, and the task-time experience as a reference point to reflect the two platforms in the differences in performance transcoding.

Either U3400 or E350 after the start of the task, the CPU occupancy rate of 100% basis Dell XPS M2010 Battery(Click for larger image)

After the start of the task, whether or Celeron U3400 E350 APU, the main CPU occupancy rate of soaring 100%, showing high-definition transcoding charge of this task for both still very high. However, in my observation, the speed Celeron U3400 platform occupies a distinct advantage, we look at how the final completion.

Celeron U3400 platform, first to complete the Dell Vostro 1310 task with a time of 37 minutes (click to enlarge)
E350 platform with 48 points when the time is only 45.3% completed the task (click to enlarge)

Test Summary: The two screenshots above, we can see, Celeron U3400 format conversion tasks to complete when using only 37 minutes, while the E350 APU after 48 minutes, only completed 45.3 % of missions in both the transcoding aspects of the performance difference is obvious. But note that, because different applications enabled for the appropriate platform that is different from the final performance is not the same, but the difference in performance between the two, to really be able to judge the two .

Product: Asus laptops UL20GU38FT Abstract: The strength of performance of architectural decisions
· Summary: The strength of performance of architectural decisions

In fact, thanks to these tests, we just want to tell you that it is the Dell Vostro 1510 Battery processor cores and can not comment on the strength of the performance of the processor architecture is the key. As we show next test this, Intel Pentium dual-core although only B940, but the operating speed of the AMD APU A6 3400 quad-core processors as strong, he himself explained the problem.
B940 Intel Pentium dual-core dual-processor architecture thread

A6 and family 3400m AMD in the "mid-CPU" position is different than Intel Pentium B940 SNB 2011, the background of a family in most entry-level processors, based on 32 nm technology, 2, 0 GHz frequency, 2MB shared L3 cache, dual-core dual-thread, do not support turbo 2.0 does not support the AVX instruction set, in terms of the specification, we can see its just a product of entry.

Intel Pentium processor performance test B940

Cinebench R10, we use the processor performance test was conducted a performance evaluation software, the software can provide a processor performance clear and intuitive single and multi-core. We see that after Cinebench R10, single-core Pentium B940 received 3197 points, 6238 points obtained performance double heart, as one of the Dell Vostro 1710 Battery entry-level processors, so performance is satisfactory.

Here, we examine four nuclear plant design A6 AMD APU 3400m test case discussion:

AMD APU A6-3400 processor has four main

We see through the recovery of CPUID, AMD 3400 A6 with a 32 nm production process, the CPU portion of the native quad-core design, the Pentium B940 over two hearts and each heart has 1MB of L2 cache, the default frequency 1.4GHz, the acceleration can be improved to 2.3 GHz. Then the A6 3400m performance quad-core processor actually do?

AMD APU A6-3400m test processor performance

Cinebench R10 we also used this software to evaluate its performance, to see if the quad is better than the A6 dual-core Pentium 3400m B940. Tested Fengyun heart of A6-3400 single processor is 1891 points, 5169 points for quad-core, from the point of view, the performance of two single-core or quad-core, Pentium B940 better than the mono-and dual- core to be lower. Can be seen, the basic performance is not necessarily more powerful, cutting-edge architecture, even with only two core Pentium B940, performance calculation, but also because A6 3400m APU, the processor in the world, only four not necessarily greater than two.